Skip to content

The queue

Recognition is growing faster than the systems built to assess it.

Access barriers in Australia are documented. They are also dated. Old waiting-time figures are not current waiting-time figures. Dispensing is not prevalence. The wait is not only months. It is the coordination the condition takes away.

Gatekeeping is necessary. The queue still asks a person — or the parent putting themselves last — to find a GP, hold a referral, research a name, discover the list is full, start again, and do it every year for a condition that does not expire. That labour lands on families, siblings, partners, employers. It is why this site exists: the thing that will help still takes the function the condition takes away.

Four quantities that get collapsed

Prevalence
How common the condition is in a population, whether or not anyone has named it. Estimated from epidemiology, not from waitlists.
Recognition
How often the condition is noticed as a possible explanation — by the person, a family, a school, or a clinician.
Diagnosis
A formal identification after assessment. Constrained by who can assess, who can pay, and which question was asked.
Service demand
How many people are trying to get through the door. Waitlists and dispensing data measure this more directly than they measure prevalence.

Do not claim that underlying ADHD or autism prevalence is necessarily rapidly increasing merely because diagnostic demand is increasing.

What the measurements actually are

Every figure carries its source, measurement period, publication date and jurisdiction. Historical inquiry evidence is labelled as such.

Inquiry, not a wait-time surveyHistorical inquiry evidence

700

submissions to the 2023 Senate ADHD inquiry

The Senate Community Affairs References Committee also heard 79 witnesses over three public hearings. This is the scale of lived and professional evidence tabled, not a prevalence estimate.

Measurement period
Inquiry conducted 2023; evidence received during the inquiry
Publication date
6 November 2023
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Historical inquiry findings. Describes barriers reported in 2023. Not a current waiting-time figure.

Historical inquiry evidenceHistorical inquiry evidence

6–18 months

typical wait for an initial ADHD appointment, as reported to the 2023 Senate inquiry

The committee reported limited availability and long waits, a thin public system especially for adults, and insufficient services in rural, regional and remote areas. Some evidence described waits of more than two years. Treat as 2023 inquiry evidence, not a 2026 measurement.

Measurement period
Evidence given to the 2023 inquiry
Publication date
6 November 2023
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Do not read this as the current national wait. Later secret-shopper measurement (May–August 2024) found a different distribution, still with long tails.

National secret-shopper studyMeasured May–August 2024

736

clinicians contacted about an ADHD assessment

Researchers posed as potential consumers seeking an ADHD assessment for themselves and/or a child. This is a measurement of access, not of how many people have ADHD.

Measurement period
May–August 2024
Publication date
25 February 2026
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Study published February 2026; the telephones were called in 2024. Access can have moved since.

Clinician availabilityMeasured May–August 2024

49.8%

of responding clinicians were available to book an ADHD assessment

Fifty-nine percent of contacted clinicians responded at all. Of those who responded, about half could take a booking. Unavailability is part of the queue, not a footnote to it.

Measurement period
May–August 2024
Publication date
25 February 2026
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Response and availability are not the same as quality of assessment.

Mean wait · psychologistsMeasured May–August 2024

7 weeks

average wait for an ADHD assessment with a psychologist

Median 3 weeks (IQR 7). Mean is pulled by a long tail. A shorter average than the 2023 inquiry's 6–18 month figure does not mean the problem is solved — psychiatrists and paediatricians were slower, and maxima ran from many months to two years.

Measurement period
May–August 2024
Publication date
25 February 2026
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Averages hide people at the far end of the distribution.

Mean wait · psychiatristsMeasured May–August 2024

16 weeks

average wait for an ADHD assessment with a psychiatrist

Median 15 weeks (IQR 16). In most Australian jurisdictions, stimulant prescribing for ADHD is still commonly tied to psychiatrists and paediatricians. Psychologist availability does not automatically unlock treatment. Western Australia is now a partial exception: specially trained GPs can assess, diagnose and prescribe for suitable patients aged 10 and over.

Measurement period
May–August 2024
Publication date
25 February 2026
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Workforce mix is a systems constraint, not a personal failure to ‘just see a GP’. Who that GP is allowed to be now depends on the jurisdiction.

Mean wait · paediatriciansMeasured May–August 2024

31 weeks

average wait for an ADHD assessment with a paediatrician

Median 26 weeks (IQR 31). Children's mean wait in this study was longer than adults'. Some families waited up to two years.

Measurement period
May–August 2024
Publication date
25 February 2026
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Child pathways and adult pathways are not interchangeable queues.

Estimated total assessment costMeasured May–August 2024

$1,622

average total ADHD assessment cost with a psychologist

Mean initial session $266 (median $250). Psychiatrists charged more for the first appointment (mean $748) but had a lower estimated total (mean $1,163), likely because psychologists more often used several sessions. Paediatrician totals were lower again (mean $598). Figures are fees quoted, before rebates.

Measurement period
May–August 2024
Publication date
25 February 2026
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Quoted fees are not the same as out-of-pocket after Medicare. They are also not a cap — some quoted totals approached several thousand dollars.

What people told the SenateHistorical inquiry evidence

46%

of analysed submissions cited high costs; 46% cited long waits

Hudson and colleagues thematically analysed 480 eligible Senate inquiry submissions. Lack of specialised care (39%), diagnostic delays (36%) and gender bias (27%) were also prominent. This is what people wrote, not a random sample of all Australians with ADHD.

Measurement period
Submissions to the 2023 Senate inquiry
Publication date
2026
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Lived-experience submissions over-represent people who could write one. The themes are still a record of the system they met.

Service demand, not prevalenceAdministrative series

2 → 22

PBS ADHD patients per 1,000 population, 2004–05 to 2023–24

AIHW reports that the population rate of people dispensed ADHD medicine under the PBS rose from 2 per 1,000 in 2004–05 to 22 per 1,000 in 2023–24, with much of the increase after 2018–19. This is dispensing. It is not a census of how many people have ADHD.

Measurement period
2004–05 to 2023–24
Publication date
20 May 2025
Jurisdiction
Australia

Caveat: Rising dispensing is evidence of rising recognised, treated demand. It is not, by itself, evidence that underlying prevalence has multiplied by eleven.

Living pathway changeCurrent jurisdictional pathway

10+

age from which specially trained GPs in Western Australia can assess, diagnose and treat ADHD under the new GP program

WA Health last reviewed this program page on 31 August 2026. Appropriately trained GPs can assess, diagnose and prescribe stimulant medicines for suitable patients aged 10 years and older, within a structured clinical governance framework developed with RACGP and AADPA. Complex presentations continue to require specialist referral. This is a jurisdictional pathway change, not a national one. It does not erase waits, costs, or fragmentation elsewhere.

Measurement period
Program page last reviewed 31 August 2026
Publication date
31 August 2026
Jurisdiction
Western Australia

Caveat: Updated on this site 2 September 2026, after the pathway changed while the page was being built. Current evidence, not archival knowledge.

A systems problem, named as one

Where systemic failure is evidenced, say so clearly: adult ADHD assessment in Australia has largely been pushed into the private sector; cost is a filter; regional access is thinner; workforce mix still ties treatment to the slower door in most jurisdictions. Western Australia is now rewriting who that door can be, for some patients, under training and governance rules. A living evidence engine records the rewrite. It does not pretend the queue has vanished.

Where practitioner knowledge is variable, that is also in the inquiry record. Variable is not the same as malicious. The strongest criticism of a fragmented healthcare system is a well-documented one.

The queue does not end at the clinic door. Last sitting week, Parliament passed the 2026 NDIS Act: some children with autism or developmental delay are pointed at Thriving Kids; participation budgets reset from October; existing participants are reassessed from 2028. The person still walks every door.

1 October fact sheet · The rulebook changed — original bill, revised Act, remaining questions · Both Sides — what was meant, heard, and agreed

This page will not tell you how long you will wait. It will not tell you what you should pay. It will not diagnose you from a queue.

Walk the diagnostic relayInspect the sources