Skip to content

Evidence / 2026

qualitative

Unmet Needs and Service Priorities for ADHD in Australia: A Thematic Analysis of Senate Inquiry Submissions

Hudson B, et al. (2026). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Population
People with lived experience of ADHD who made written submissions to the 2023 Australian Senate inquiry
Sample
480 eligible submissions
Condition
ADHD; unmet need and service priorities
Medication focus
Not a treatment trial
Jurisdiction
Australia
Last reviewed
1 September 2026
Measurement period
Submissions to the 2023 Senate inquiry
PMID
41595917

Plain-language finding

Thematic analysis of 480 eligible Senate inquiry submissions found high costs and long wait times for assessment and treatment each cited by 46% of submissions, lack of specialised care by 39%, diagnostic delays by 36%, and gender bias by 27%.

Important limitation

Submissions are not a probability sample. People who write to a Senate inquiry differ from people who do not. Percentages describe the corpus of submissions, not the Australian ADHD population.

Why we cite this

A systematic reading of what people told the Senate about cost, waits, specialised care and delay.

adhd · australia · access · cost · lived-experience · stigma · service-design

Research demonstrates a statistical relationship. Association is not causation. Timing, dose, confounding and missing data still matter.

Claims this source supports

  • In Australia, ADHD assessment is constrained by clinician availability, waiting time, out-of-pocket cost, a thin public adult pathway, and regional gaps. Recognition is growing faster than the systems built to assess it.

    Last reviewed 2 September 2026